Software Development
Blogs and Discussion
developer.*
Books Articles Blogs Subscribe d.* Gear About Home

C++

Request to my readership for clarification concerning C#

OK, I can see why the designers of C# did not implement the preprocessor of C++ and C. It creates obfuscated code, and its functionality, as I learned several years ago from Number One Son, its functionality is largely replaced by objects.

For me, furthermore, it doesn't go far enough. This is because the preprocessor of PL/I was Turing complete in that you could create loops in the preprocessor and, from a logical standpoint, the preprocessor was a full "computer", allowing you to ship seriously customizable (and, seriously obfuscated) solutions.

But I find the string model of C# supports the concept of "scan for any one of a SET of characters" that is found in C strspn, but FAILS to support (as far as I can determine) the concept of "scan for any one of the COMPLEMENT of a SET of characters" as seen in strcspn.

Categories:  |
Syndicate content

Recent comments

User login

About our advertising.

Atom Feed

developer.* Blogs also has an Atom feed, located at this url.

Click here for more information about Atom.

A Jolt Award Finalist
Software Creativity 2.0
Foreword by Tom DeMarco

Recent Posters

Based on most recent 60 days, sorted by # of posts and name.

Google
Web developer.*

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 39 guests online.

Syndicate

Syndicate content
All views expressed by authors, bloggers, and commentors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of developer.* or its proprietors.
Click to read the Copyright Notice.

All content copyright ©2000-2005 by the individual specified authors (and where not specified, copyright by Read Media, LLC). Reprint or redistribute only with written permission from the author and/or developer.*.

www.developerdotstar.com